Jed (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} jedbro) wrote,@ 2005-02-16 15:18:00 |
|
FUD from Cnet regarding Firefox
Just when I thought the old days of bad articles regard mentioning Firefox and Mozilla were over, (recent cnet articles have been positive), some Molly Wood on C|Net posts the most ridiculous article titled "IE 7: so much for Firefox", that I have read in years.
Excerpt: "It was bad when Microsoft seemed to ignore Firefox, treating it like a harmless upstart not worthy of comment or attack. But now that the sleeping giant has awakened, I think the buzzing gnat of the browser wars is about to be squashed flat."
Pathetic!
Head over there and let Molly know she needs to stop writing Tech Articles she knows nothing about.
Just when I thought the old days of bad articles regard mentioning Firefox and Mozilla were over, (recent cnet articles have been positive), some Molly Wood on C|Net posts the most ridiculous article titled "IE 7: so much for Firefox", that I have read in years.
Excerpt: "It was bad when Microsoft seemed to ignore Firefox, treating it like a harmless upstart not worthy of comment or attack. But now that the sleeping giant has awakened, I think the buzzing gnat of the browser wars is about to be squashed flat."
Pathetic!
Head over there and let Molly know she needs to stop writing Tech Articles she knows nothing about.
